Last post of 2012 and I’m going out with a semi-big bang towing the line of controversial!
What I’m about to get into may offend women, but enlighten men in the same breath.
Women and logics are as different as night and day!
Or how about water in a frying pan dabbed in hot oil?
They just don’t cooperate well together.
I can already see streams of hate-mail from women flooding my inbox saying, “Fuck you Kenny! You’re such an asshole”!!!
I can explain!
Actually, I’ll illustrate some classic cases and examples of mental masturbation and irrational behaviors by women (as pertain to dating).
Long-time followers of this blog would have read the post: Women are illogical and non-rational.
If you haven’t; then check it out!
Ok, there’s actually a method to the madness as to why a girl will feel the need to psych herself out and become irrational when dealing with a guy.
Men understand and are able to process logics and rationality.
Women on the other hand do not process logics in a logical manner as we guys do.
That’s why trying to communicate from a (male) logical standpoint with a girl, or with a rational argument, would be a HUGE fucking waste of time.
For instance, you’re in a heated argument with your GF, and she blurts out to you:
GF: “What would you do to show that you really love me”!!!?
You [the male] being a rational-logical creature, will respond with logical, rational answers [as anyone would]:
BF: “Honey, I want to start taking you out more, walks in the park, go on a romantic cruise to the Mediterranean, buy you that diamond ring you’ve been dying for, tell you I love you more often than before…”
Logical, logical, logical…
Sure, those are the right things to say!
Only problem is that those promises are all LOGICAL, RATIONAL and make sense.
Since women are EMOTIONAL beings, therefore, they do not comprehend rationality [when dealing with men].
They comprehend EMOTIONS!
That’s why arguing a woman with points which makes logical sense will seem foreign and nonsensical to her.
She can only process emotional responses- which are illogical [Chic Logics].
Let’s dabble a bit in Chick Logics just to illustrate how differently women process rational shit opposed to the way men do.
Women use “Chic Logics” in order to process things!
Ever heard the saying, “Never argue with a woman”, or that you can never win an argument with a girl?
We’re all familiar with those cache phrases.
It’s not that women are so skilled in the art of arguing [although women are smarter than men].
It’s because they’re fucking equipped with built-in Chic Logics!
There’s no way to win or resolve a conflict in a logical fashion with someone who’s presenting her point of view from an emotional/illogical standpoint!
So that’s why girls always kick our asses when it comes to arguing and verbal throw-downs.
We (men) bring logical data and facts to the table, while she’s dishing out verbal barrages of Chic Logics and emotional babbling. So she’ll always win that battle!
[Take note of the raw contradictions in what she says and actually does in contrary to logics]
Girl: “I’m coming to see you later. But under 1 condition: we’re not having sex”.
•She comes over later then ends up having sex anyway.
Girl: “I hate that guy! He thinks he’s God’s gift to women”!
•Logics would say: then don’t fuck with such a guy.
•She ends up hooking up with this same guy she “supposedly” hates.
Girl: “We’re not gonna have sex because that would be cheating…and I don’t cheat on my boyfriend.
•So she gives the guy a blowjob and swallows a massive load instead.
Girl: “I don’t kiss on the 1st. date”.
•Logics would say: then if she doesn’t kiss on first dates, she damn sure wouldn’t fuck on first dates.
•But ends up having sex on the 1st. date [as if full-blown sex is less sluttier than kissing on the first date].
Girl: “You think I’m some kinda tramp who’s just gonna make out with some fucking strange guy I don’t know”!?
•Little did we know; she’s had ONS’ (One-Night Stands) with random dudes in the past. I guess that is OK, but making out isn’t?
Girl: “I’m going out with my girls later, so I won’t be able to see you”.
•Later comes: “Hey Kenny, do you wanna hang out”?
Guy checks out girl’s boobs as they’re talking face to face:
Girl says to her girlfriends afterwards [via Chic Logics]: “He was staring at my fucking tits all night!? What a damn sleaze-ball”!
•Logics would say: why wear something so revealing and skimpy yet get all offended and bitchy whenever men stare?
In all reality; she wants and loves the sexual attention that she gets from men, but her innate-ILLOGICAL mechanism forces her to go contrary to what she LOGICALLY wants [for men to check her out].
On a personal note, this is what a former Fuck-Buddy of mines said to me 2 days ago [check out the chic-logics at play]:
Me: “Hey *******, I’m at an after-Christmas function. I wanna pass by you at 9”.
Girl: “Cool! But we not gonna have sex though. I have a boyfriend now. But we can cuddle”.
Me: “Cuddling is good”.
Went to hang out with her at 10 PM. We cuddled and I banged her.
Logics would say:
•Since you have a boyfriend, why the fuck should you invite another guy over, under the pretense of “Cuddling”?
•Should you even be cuddling with another guy anyway?
•If you really didn’t wanna have sex, didn’t you think that cuddling with a guy you were once intimate with would be a bad idea?
What makes this illogical, irrational and nonsensical, is that she knows if we cuddle, it’d lead to sex without a doubt.
Therefore, she shouldn’t have allowed me to come over (to cuddle).
She wanted sex!
But she has to go about soliciting sex from me in an illogical fashion.
Guys, that is how Chic-Logics work!
It’s fucked up!
Chics engage in such illogical “psych-your-mind” situations on a day to day basis as far as dating, sex and relationships go.
Had I been the average guy who never heard of “Chic Logics”, I would’ve taken such maneuvering by girls as literal, deceptive and offensive.
She said she wants to cuddle.
The average guy (unaware of Chic-Logics) would say:
“Nah I’m ok. I’m not up for just cuddling”.
Little does he know, she didn’t want to cuddle in all reality; she wanted to fuck.
However, a combination of Chic-Logics and her ASD (anti-slut defense) prevented her from admitting she wanted to fuck.
Men would see such a thing as lying, contradictive, misleading and down-right uncalled for.
Once again; that is men looking at things from a “Rational” standpoint instead of an “Emotional” one.
Women talk emotions. Not logics!
I’m curious to know what my female readers feel about this article: bullshit, or makes sense?
•Women are against using condoms by Socialkenny PUA.
•Reframing away a girl’s Anti-Slut Defense by Krauser PUA.
•Anti-Slut Defense; how society drives women bat-shit crazy about sex by Sarah Ann, female PUA coach for ABC’s of Attraction.